The first quarter of 2025 was marked by heightened volatility across global markets, driven by escalating trade policies and shifting investor sentiment. The uncertainty related to tariff decisions, including surrounding President Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariff announcement on April 2, dominated sentiment over the quarter, causing both the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq 100 to enter correction territory. This rampant uncertainty and subsequent volatility prompted asset managers like Goldman Sachs to slash their year-end target for the S&P 500 to 5,700 on heightened recession risks, which would only represent a ~1.5% increase from quarter-end levels.

Signs of defensive rotations emerged over the quarter, as investors flocked to gold (up 19% YTD) and Treasury bonds (10-year yield down 35 bps YTD) while high-quality/low-volatility stocks outperformed their growth counterparts, illustrating a broader flight to safety. Below are highlights from the first quarter of the year.

1. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 hit correction territory in March, dropping more than 10% from February’s peak. At their worst, on March 13, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 were down 10.03% and 13.23%, respectively, from their peaks on February 19. The declines were largely driven by uncertainty surrounding impending tariffs, while negative performance in the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 was driven by significant setbacks in tech mega-caps due to rising competition and valuation concerns.
2. Tariff Turmoil Reshapes Markets: The Trump administration’s planned reciprocal tariffs (targeting 25% on auto imports and 20% on various “country-based” levies) created crosscurrents: U.S. energy producers rallied on potential Russian crude restrictions; the “Magnificent Seven” stocks extended their quarterly rout to nearly 16%; market correlations plunged to 25-year lows as investors scrambled to price disparate sector impacts; and the S&P 500 underperformed foreign equities by the largest margin since 2009.
   
   
   Source Link: Bloomberg
   
   Despite this turmoil, Morgan Stanley’s Mike Wilson noted, “This isn’t a market falling apart; it’s a market fighting through uncertainty” with recent geopolitical developments heavily influencing market dynamics. President Trump’s tariffs have stirred anxiety across global markets as investors weigh the potential economic fallout, with many sectors preparing for the implications of increased trade barriers
3. European nations initiated major fiscal reforms aimed at bolstering infrastructure and defense spending, creating opportunities for domestic industries amid global uncertainty. U.S. equity markets have been particularly reactive to these developments, exhibiting pronounced swings due to potentially adverse impacts on U.S. economic growth and corporate earnings. While the Stoxx Europe 600 Index continues to benefit from renewed fiscal confidence, reinforced by Germany’s expansive infrastructure investment plans, U.S. indices grapple with regulatory and trade uncertainties. The crosscurrents between domestic and international equity markets reflect broader macroeconomic challenges as policymakers and investors navigate the evolving landscape of global trade and fiscal policy responses.
4. Chinese startup DeepSeek emerged as a disruptive force with its advanced AI model. This development triggered a significant tech selloff, with the Nasdaq 100 experiencing a 3% drop in a single trading day. The announcement of DeepSeek’s low-cost, energy-efficient AI technology raised serious concerns over the valuations of U.S. tech giants that have dominated the AI landscape. Notably, Nvidia Corp., a key player in AI hardware, faced a dramatic market value reduction, losing almost $600 billion during this period. This unprecedented loss marked Nvidia’s worst performance since the initial pandemic-related market responses in March 2020. DeepSeek’s advancements have prompted a reevaluation of the high spending trajectory adopted by major companies like Microsoft Corp., Meta Platforms Inc., and Alphabet Inc., challenging their investment strategies in AI infrastructure and highlighting potential shifts in future technology investments.
5. Cryptocurrency, once considered an ultra-high-risk investment, is gaining greater acceptance among retail and institutional investors. Despite the fluctuations in adoption, institutional interest in cryptocurrencies remains intact, demonstrated by recent fund inflows into crypto investment vehicles. A major example is BlackRock Inc. (BLK), who made headlines by announcing a significant expansion in its cryptocurrency offerings, attracting institutional investors and spurring additional fund inflows into the asset class, including the recent launch of a European Bitcoin ETP or exchange-traded product. Product expansions in this space underscore the sustained institutional interest in cryptocurrencies, with market analysts emphasizing the continued importance of monitoring regulatory dynamics and macroeconomic pressures as key drivers of cryptocurrency performance moving forward. Despite this recent momentum, Bitcoin (BTCUSD) is down nearly 11% to start the year.
6. Geopolitical Tensions and Volatility: Mounting uncertainties within the financial markets due to global tariff dynamics and geopolitical tensions have added another layer of complexity to the investment environment. The tension between Israel and neighboring countries has intensified, impacting regional stability and influencing energy markets amid concerns over supply disruptions. Additionally, the war in Russia/Ukraine wages on with no clear path to a resolution, particularly after a heated discussion between President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelensky in February. These geopolitical strains have contributed to increased volatility in commodity prices, particularly oil, as market participants closely monitor developments for any potential escalation that could further disrupt supply chains. As countries in the regions navigate these challenges, investors are advised to remain cautious, considering the geopolitical risk premiums that might affect market sentiment and valuations.
7. Gold prices set a new record in Q1 2025, surpassing $3,100 per ounce. The precious metal’s value soared more than 19% this quarter, marking its largest three-month gain since 2011. This substantial rise was fueled by heightened market uncertainty from U.S. tariff policy and geopolitical tensions, prompting investors to seek refuge in safe-haven assets. The rally in gold was further bolstered by significant inflows into bullion exchange-traded funds, which received $12.7 billion over the quarter, reflecting investor sentiment favoring risk-averse strategies amid the volatile economic landscape.
8. The U.S. Dollar experienced notable fluctuations throughout Q1 2025, recording its worst first-quarter performance since 2017. The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index, which rose slightly by 0.2% in the last week of the quarter, reflected broader concerns about rising tariff-related risks and global economic uncertainty. The Dollar’s declining strength can be attributed to increasing investor anxiety over President Trump’s trade policies, leading to movements toward safer currencies such as the Japanese yen and Swiss franc. These two haven currencies appreciated 1.8% against the Dollar amid escalating geopolitical and economic tensions.

Market Recap 

Equities – Equities in the U.S. struggled as the threat of trade wars and conflicting monetary and fiscal policies proved too much for stocks, resulting in their worst quarter since 2022. Under the hood of broad market performance, markets witnessed varied sector performances, painting a more nuanced picture of market dynamics in the current environment. The S&P 500 faced challenges, finishing the quarter down 4.27%, highlighting investor apprehension over President Trump’s evolving trade policies. The Nasdaq 100 experienced its worst quarterly performance in nearly three years, declining 8.07% amid fears of an AI investment bubble and uncertainties surrounding tech spending and valuation metrics.

Meanwhile, defensive sectors such as healthcare, utilities, and consumer staples thrived as investors flocked to safer corners of the market in response to mounting risks. Overall, the first quarter underscored the complexities and crosscurrents facing investors, with varied sector performances highlighting the necessity of strategic positioning in response to evolving fiscal policies and global economic dynamics. As Q2 unfolds, market participants remain vigilant, focusing on geopolitical developments and macroeconomic indicators to navigate the ongoing volatility in addition to sector diversification.

Bonds – The bond market also experienced significant volatility in Q1 2025, and, like its equity counterparts, this volatility was driven primarily by shifting economic expectations and geopolitical uncertainties. U.S. Treasury yields fluctuated notably, with the 10-year yield trading within a 65-basis point range, ending the quarter at approximately 4.23%. The uncertainty surrounding President Trump’s tariff policies has raised concerns about potential economic disruptions and inflationary pressures. As investors sought safe-haven assets amid these uncertainties, Treasury bonds saw increased demand, leading to periodic declines in yields and a positive 2.78% return in bonds, as measured by the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index.

High yield credit markets also faced turbulence, as spreads widened 63-basis points (0.63%) from 2.92% to 3.55%, the highest level since August 2024. Concerns over economic growth and corporate earnings, magnified by geopolitical tensions and trade policy shifts, contributed to a risk-averse sentiment that impacted credit markets. Despite these challenges, high yields bonds exhibited relative stability and still produced a 1.00% return over the quarter.

Market participants are closely monitoring the Federal Reserve’s policy stance and anticipated economic data releases, which will likely influence bond market dynamics in the coming months.

Source: YCharts. The Bloomberg US Aggregate Index was used as a proxy for Bonds; the Bloomberg US High Yield 2% Issuer Capped Index was used as a proxy for High Yield Bonds; the Russell 2000 Index was used as a proxy for Small Cap Equities; and the MSCI ACWI Ex USA Index was used as a proxy for Foreign Equities.  All returns are based on total return levels as of 3/31/2025.

Economy: GDP and Consumer Spending in Q1 2025

Consumer spending in the first quarter of 2025 demonstrated subdued growth, reflecting a cautious atmosphere among consumers due to economic uncertainty and rising inflationary pressures. After declining 0.6% in January, inflation-adjusted consumer spending edged up merely 0.1% in February, revealing hesitation in household expenditures. February was notably challenging, as Americans reduced spending on services for the first time in three years, a direct result of persistent price increases and economic concerns. The slow pace of consumer spending highlights mounting anxieties over the broader economic landscape, which is becoming further complicated by significant geopolitical and domestic policy challenges, including ongoing tariff disputes.

The challenges faced by the U.S. economy in the first quarter of 2025 were further demonstrated in the projections for real GDP growth. According to the GDPNow model estimate from the Atlanta Fed, real GDP growth for Q1 2025, as of March 28, is projected to be -2.8%, representing a stark contrast from the same model’s forecast on February 21, which projected the U.S. economy would grow at +2.3% annualized rate. This downturn also marks a notable shift from previous quarters, reflecting widespread economic uncertainties and the impact of tariff policies. The alternative model forecast, which accounts for imports and exports of gold, adjusted the decline to a milder -0.5%, a further illustration of investors’ flock to safety over the quarter.

Factors contributing to this sharp decline include a notable reduction in net exports, which dragged down GDP growth by an estimated -4.79% in the standard model. While we believe the economy is slowing and facing several headwinds marred with uncertainty, we recognize that the estimates from the Atlanta Fed may be more dire than we actually experience, particularly since the spike in imports is a result of companies accelerating purchases ahead of tariffs, which will likely be offset in the Inventories measure and result in a more negligible outcome than the Atlanta Fed model is forecasting. The ongoing trade tensions, particularly those involving tariffs, cast a shadow over economic activities, leading businesses and consumers to exercise caution. As these dynamics unfold, market participants should closely watch for potential policy responses and economic indicators that could signal recovery or further challenges in the quarters ahead. Additionally, as clarity is gained on tariff policy, we expect some of these trends to reverse or improve.

It is worth mentioning that the implementation of tariffs is largely motivated by reducing the federal trade deficit, which has been in deficit since the 1970s, meaning that the U.S. has been importing more than it has been exporting for decades. Observing this trend helps explain why President Trump is aggressively pursuing tariffs to help accomplish his “Make America Great Again” agenda – bringing manufacturing jobs back to America and incentivizing the consumption of domestic goods should theoretically improve the U.S. economy in the long-term, all while reducing the trade deficit. Additionally, when imports exceed exports, foreign economies benefit more, and the domestic government must stimulate domestic growth in other ways, typically through government spending, which ultimately can lead to budget deficits. This means that trade deficits are connected to budget deficits, so reducing the trade deficit through tariffs should bode well for the U.S. economy in the long-term, but, as President Trump has indicated, the consumer may feel some pain in the short-term.

Labor Market Dynamics

A mix of growth and challenges characterized the labor market in the first quarter of 2025, as the U.S. economy navigated the broader economic uncertainties. Nonfarm payrolls increased by a seasonally adjusted 151,000 in February, representing a stable yet cautious expansion versus expected figures of 170,000. Despite this positive trend, the unemployment rate edged higher to 4.1%, indicating some softening in labor market conditions.

Within this landscape, specific sectors exhibited varying employment trends. Healthcare continued to lead job creation with 52,000 new positions, followed by gains in financial activities and transportation. However, sectors such as retail and government experienced declines, reflecting the impact of administrative changes and fiscal policies being carried out by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk. The reductions made by DOGE caused federal government employment to drop by 10,000 jobs as efforts to reduce the federal workforce began to manifest, with future reductions anticipated. These efforts, part of a broader initiative to streamline government operations and improve efficiency, are expected to continue over the coming months, potentially impacting labor market trends and federal services.

Market participants are keenly observing upcoming jobs report releases for signals of employment trends, especially as economic conditions remain highly influenced by geopolitical and domestic fiscal developments.

Inflation, Stagflation, and Monetary Policy

In the first quarter of 2025, inflation trends exhibited volatility, impacted by persistent economic uncertainties and evolving trade policies. Core inflation, as measured by the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index, accelerated to 2.8% annually in February, indicating heightened inflationary pressures that outpaced the Federal Reserve’s 2% target. The rise in core inflation was driven by sustained increases in the costs of goods and services, fueled partly by anticipatory spending ahead of tariff implementations. February’s higher inflation reading, paired with retaliatory tariff projections and slowing consumer spending, has evolved into concerns about stagflation — a troubling combination of slowing economic growth and persistent and elevated inflation. These concerns were underscored by a Bloomberg Economics analysis, which warned that the anticipated tariffs could elevate U.S. tariff rates significantly, creating a drag on GDP of up to 4% and pushing inflation higher by about 2.5% over several years.

The consumer spending lethargy reflected heightened household budget constraints alongside an uptick in inflation expectations to a nearly 30-year high, as surveyed by the University of Michigan. Given these dynamics, combined with mounting consumer and business anxieties over Trump’s trade policies, economists are forming a growing consensus that the U.S. economy could face both a slower growth trajectory and elevated price levels, challenging policymakers to navigate these choppy economic waters effectively.

Though mostly taking a backseat to President Trump in the first quarter, monetary policy remained a focal point as the Federal Reserve maintained its benchmark interest rate in the 4.25% to 4.50% range at their March Fed Meeting. Central bank officials expressed concern over the potential inflationary impact of tariffs, with conflicting views on whether these price pressures would be transient or more persistent. Interestingly, Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic highlighted a cautious stance, refraining from labeling the inflationary effects as “transitory,” a word steeped in history. The Fed had initially termed the recent post-COVID inflation surge as transitory, when it ended up being the worst bout of inflation the U.S. has seen since the 1980s and a fight the Fed is still fighting today, so markets are sensitive to the use of this word in today’s environment. This cautious monetary approach indicates the Federal Reserve’s intent to closely monitor forthcoming data and global economic developments closely, ensuring that policy adjustments align with evolving inflation trends and economic conditions.

The Fed’s updated Statement of Economic Projections confirmed their pace of rate reductions in 2025 of 50 basis points or two potential 25 basis point cuts. The Federal Reserve updated its economic projections to reflect its concerns about a slowing economic environment, as evidenced by its lower real GDP outlook, higher unemployment, and elevated inflation estimates. As market participants navigate these nuanced dynamics, attention remains focused on future monetary policy decisions and their implications for broader economic stability. We anticipate the Fed to maintain its patient and methodical approach to future rate reductions, particularly in the absence of clarity on fiscal policy.

Centura’s Outlook

As we wrote in our letter to clients addressing the market volatility and correction in mid-March, “Ultimately, in the absence of clarity on the path of fiscal and monetary policy, now is not the time to make drastic changes to investment positioning.”

Unfortunately, the outcomes expected to result from proposed political changes are in direct conflict with the Fed’s dual mandate of maximizing employment and achieving price stability, at least for the near future. For example, sweeping tariffs on U.S. trading partners are likely to increase prices, stoking the very inflation that the Fed is trying to tame. This contrast has led investors to react to speculation and flock to safe-haven investments like bonds and gold. Given the erratic decision-making of our Commander in Chief, we expect volatility to continue to plague markets until more clarity is provided. As discussed, several potential risks are looming and investors should proceed carefully.

Prospects of a U.S. recession are mixed, not only among economists, but asset classes as well. As Chris Ellis, a high-yield bond portfolio manager at Axa Investment Managers stated, “Credit markets in the U.S. are pricing in a much lower chance of a recession than equity markets are and something has to give.” In mid-March, a JPMorgan Chase model indicated the S&P 500 was pricing in a 33% probability of a recession, while credit markets are implying a recession probability of 12%. While markets observed a selloff in high yield credit spreads along with equity markets, history would indicate a significantly larger selloff would need to occur to start sounding the recession alarm bells. Credit spreads generally foreshadow a recession when the premium for junk bonds approaches 8%, or 800-basis points. The current credit spread is 3.55%. The health of today’s credit markets illustrates how equity investors are likely overreacting to speculation surrounding the long-term impacts of the policies. While we don’t believe a recession is imminent, we are closely monitoring any further deterioration in credit as policies unfold.

On a more positive note, the downward pressure on the price of stocks factored with stronger than expected earnings growth has brought valuations in line with more reasonable levels. According to FactSet, the forward 12-month price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) declined from 22.3x at year-end to 20.5x as of March 28, which is now only slightly higher than both the 5-year and 10-year averages of 19.9x and 18.3x, respectively. As we witnessed in the first quarter, valuations continue to pose a risk to the market, as negative sentiment can lead to sharper sell-offs on overvalued securities. While the concentration of the top 10 largest stocks in the S&P 500 fell in Q1 2025, they still pose a significant risk. According to JPMorgan, the 10 largest constituents represent 35% of the index, as of March 31, slightly down from 38.7% at year-end.

As we communicated in our 4Q 2024 Market Wrap, and reiterated in our March client letter, concentrations like this make the index vulnerable to significant changes in those underlying companies, particularly when those 10 companies are more overvalued than the remaining 490 companies. The P/E of the top 10 is currently 24.4x, while the remaining stocks currently boast a P/E in line with their 10-year averages of 18.3x. Concentrations like this are precisely why we favor global diversification across several asset classes – both public and private – and helped support our decision to reduce both large-cap and large-cap technology stock exposure in our allocations at the beginning of the year.

In the face of higher costs, corporate profits remain resilient, as illustrated by the sixth consecutive quarter of positive earnings growth by the S&P 500, rising a remarkable 18.2% in the fourth quarter. As of March 28, FactSet estimates first-quarter earnings to expand at a slower pace of 7.3% year-over-year. Earnings season will kickstart in early April, where we will be keying in on management’s commentary on the impacts of fiscal and monetary policy changes on forward-looking earnings projections and capital expenditures (investment), and we fully anticipate witnessing revisions to the downside.

From the political leader changes in France, Germany, and Canada to the ongoing armed conflicts, notably in the Middle East, where tensions between Israel and Iran remain escalated, and in Russia-Ukraine where discussions are evolving between Putin, Zelensky, and Trump – international markets remain on fragile ground despite their strong first quarter returns. As these international disputes unfold, they have a cascading effect on market sentiment, influencing everything from currency valuations to sector performance.
The specter of further geopolitical instability remains a crucial factor to monitor, particularly in retaliation to the unveiling of “Liberation Day” tariffs on April 2. Potential policy responses from global leaders are poised to have far-reaching consequences for economic forecasts and asset allocations worldwide. We anticipate that both the announcement of the “Liberation Day” tariffs and global leaders’ responses will generate increased market volatility, further supporting the case for global diversification across both public and private markets.

In conclusion, Q1 2025 started on a sour note, and until we have clarity surrounding fiscal and monetary policy, we expect sentiment to deteriorate further. Our allocations remain balanced and in line with our long-term targets. We expect volatility to remain in the short-term as markets work through the political noise and reassess potential economic ramifications; however, in the longer-term, we expect solid earnings growth to drive equity markets. Diversification across several public and private market asset classes should serve clients well in 2025 as we navigate this complex investing environment. As always, investors should remain vigilant to potential risks while positioning themselves to capitalize on opportunities in the evolving market landscape.

Thank you for your continued confidence and support. If you have questions or concerns, please contact your Centura Wealth advisor.

The information provided is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. You should consult your attorney or tax advisor.  

The views expressed in this commentary are subject to change based on the market and other conditions. These documents may contain certain statements that may be deemed forward-looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected. Any projections, market outlooks, or estimates are based upon certain assumptions and should not be construed as indicative of actual events that will occur.   All information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed.  There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability, or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information and it should not be relied on as such.

Centura Wealth Advisory is a registered investment advisor. Advisory services are only offered to clients or prospective clients where Centura Wealth Advisory and its representatives are properly licensed or exempt from licensure. 12255 El Camino Real, St. 125, San Diego, CA 92130.

At a Glance

Macro Indicators: Headline and core PCE inflation rose by 2.5% and 2.6%, respectively, in January. These increases matched expectations but, combined with higher CPI data, grew consumer worries that inflation may remain elevated. The January jobs report gave mixed signals, with only 143,000 jobs added in the labor market (vs. a 169,000 forecast), but another drop in the unemployment rate to 4.0%. Atlanta Fed GDPNow estimates for Q1 2025 GDP surprisingly turned sharply negative as of month-end.

Trump 2.0: Tariffs dominated headlines over the month, with a 10% tariff on China currently in place and possibly more tariffs coming on countries like Mexico, Canada, and the EU, in addition to reciprocal tariffs.

Fed & Monetary Policy: The Fed continues to reiterate its patient approach to interest rate cuts. The minutes from the January FOMC meeting revealed that tariffs are troubling the Fed, which could potentially result in fewer interest rate cuts than initially projected this year. As of the December “Dot Plot,” Fed officials have projected two 25-bps cuts in 2025.

Equity Markets: Major U.S. indices finished February in the red after a volatile month. The Q4 2024 earnings season is nearly wrapped up, with 97% of companies in the S&P 500 having already reported. The current quarterly earnings growth rate on a year-over-year basis is 18.2%, well above initial expectations.

Asset Class Performance

Somewhat surprisingly, Trump’s tariff announcements over the month hit U.S. equity markets hardest, whereas international equity markets posted modest growth. Real estate was the best performer over the month, a likely result of heightened inflation expectations, and bond markets saw positive growth, with investment grade outperforming high yield.

Source: YCharts. Asset class performance is presented using total returns for an index proxy that best represents the respective broad asset class. U.S. Bonds (Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond TR), U.S. High Yield (Bloomberg U.S. Corporate High Yield TR), International Bonds (Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD TR), U.S. Large Cap (S&P 500 TR), U.S. Small Cap (Russell 2000 TR), Developed International (MSCI ACWI ex US TR), Emerging Markets (MSCI EM TR), and Real Estate (Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate TR).

Markets & Macroeconomics

Trump’s Approach to Tariffs

February brought lots of action on the tariff front. President Trump applied tariffs on China (with possibly more to come) and threatened tariffs on neighboring countries Canada and Mexico, as well as commodities, like aluminum and steel. The administration also launched an investigation into the trading practices of copper, and in retaliation from impacted countries, Trump announced potential “reciprocal” tariffs, which could affect U.S. goods like electronics, motor vehicles, and pharmaceuticals. While most of these policies have not been implemented, taken in total, they could push tariff rates to their highest level since the 1930s, begging the questions: why higher tariffs now and should markets be concerned?

In answering the first question, it is important to remember that a tariff is a tax on imports, which typically raises prices for domestic consumers, but, theoretically, allows domestic producers to better compete globally – a stance that supports Trump’s “Make America Great Again” mantra. Higher tariffs should support domestic production of goods, making the U.S. less reliant on imports, hopefully to the dual benefit of promoting U.S. manufacturing and reducing the country’s trade deficit, which has been in deficit since the 1970s, illustrated in Exhibit 1. Trump’s tariffs are also meant to curb “national security” threats, including illegal immigration and drug trafficking, from places like China, Canada, and Mexico. When Trump focuses on “national security” measures, he is using tariffs as more of a negotiating tactic to end unfair trade practices and impose stricter border controls, all while producing government revenue to offset spending in other areas of his fiscal policy agenda. Whether or not all of Trump’s proposed tariffs will be implemented, there is no doubt that higher tariffs represent a departure from the low tariff environment that characterized much of the American 20th century, illustrated in Exhibit 2.

Exhibit 1: U.S. Goods Trade Balance to GDP

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Tariffs in the context of 2025, however, have introduced concerns on their impact to inflation and economic expansion. So, should markets be concerned? The answer boils down to maybe. Tariffs can increase prices for the domestic consumer, and while this doesn’t always have a broader inflationary impact, they could threaten the progress the U.S. has made on inflation in the past two years, which investors worry could result in a potential slowdown in growth. If tariffs are indeed being used as a negotiating tactic, it could also spark trade wars with key trading partners (think China), which could have more lasting economic impacts. As with anything related to politics, uncertainty is perhaps the only thing that is certain, and investors should continue to focus on the potential economic impacts of tariffs while filtering through the political noise as best as possible. Tariffs are not the end of the world, but American consumers may feel some pain if (and when) implemented.

Exhibit 2: U.S. Average Effective Tariff Rate

Source: The Budget Lab

The Bottom Line: Tariffs are being used by the Trump Administration as a negotiating tactic to promote his “Make America Great Again” agenda and generate additional revenue for the government, prompting concerns from investors on the economic impacts to inflation and growth. The actual impact of tariffs remains uncertain, particularly as Trump continues to add to the tariff pile, potentially sparking trade wars with unknown timing and outcomes.

Looking Ahead

The Consumer Turns Gloomy

The American consumer has endured a great deal over the past few years: higher interest rates, which have raised financing costs (including the cost of owning a home), as well as inflation, which has resulted in higher prices in almost every pocket of the economy. Despite these trends, the consumer has remained steadfast in their spending and stayed relatively positive about the state of the U.S. economy, but uncertainty related to both fiscal and monetary policy in 2025 is causing the consumer to re-evaluate everything. There are multiple surveys and indicators that measure consumer confidence and expectations, which can provide important insight into what consumers are thinking, which is ultimately what drives consumer behavior and subsequently market performance and economic growth

Exhibit 3: Consumer Inflation Expectations

Source: The University of Michigan

The latest Consumer Confidence Index reading came in below forecasts, registering the largest decline since 2021. Similarly, the University of Michigan’s survey of consumer inflation expectations signified heightened uncertainty surrounding future inflation, illustrated in Exhibit 3. The results of these two surveys indicate that consumers have become more pessimistic about the future economy, and this is likely driven by multiple factors, including stubborn inflation that is causing the Fed to keep interest rates at current levels, in addition to a high degree of uncertainty coming from the White House, with policies that could negatively impact both inflation and growth.

Additionally, the yield curve, which normalized in August 2024 after being inverted for over 2 years, re-inverted in the 10-year to 3-month portion of the curve on February 26. Yield curve inversions are a well-known recession indicator, and the latest inversion added fuel to the consumer-gloom-fire. While the latest consumer data is concerning, the danger with measuring expectations is that they can sometimes become a self-fulfilling prophecy. Today, history can provide an important lesson and perhaps a potential opportunity: when consumer confidence bottoms, positive equity market returns have typically followed, illustrated in Exhibit 4.

Exhibit 4: Consumer Confidence vs. S&P 500

Source: J.P. Morgan Guide to the Markets

Even when consumer sentiment is negative, it remains critical to stay invested in markets because exiting the market could mean missing out on potential strong equity returns, like what was witnessed after the 2022 equity market bottom. Whether the U.S. is headed for a recession will depend on macroeconomic variables like inflation, the labor market, and GDP growth, not the results of consumer surveys, even though they can provide insights. Despite what consumers may believe, the U.S. economy is still faring relatively well, and while that doesn’t mean there aren’t risks, monitoring the incoming data and staying diversified will remain critical in both the current and future environments.

The Bottom Line: The most recent readings of consumer surveys indicate growing pessimism about the future state of the U.S. economy, but investors should remember that markets are subject to extremes, and it is better to stay prudently invested during these times of uncertainty to avoid missing out on the positive equity returns that can follow.

Capital Markets Themes

What Worked, What Didn’t

•Values Bests Growth (Again): Growth stocks continue to struggle in 2025, as AI and Mag 7 darlings couldn’t keep pace with high market expectations, continuing to support the story of equity market breadth, or broader participation.

•Flight to Quality: Investment-grade bonds outperformed high-yield counterparts by about 130 bps over the month, emphasizing the importance of maintaining core exposure to bonds.

•Long Duration Looks Favorable: Longer-duration bonds performed well over the month, an important reminder that this positioning stands to benefit from an investor flight to safety and even interest rate cuts.

Source: YCharts. Data call-out figures represent total monthly returns

On Alternatives

Private Versus Public Equities

Public equity valuations remain rich, with the S&P 500 trading at 21.2x forward earnings as of month-end, above both the 5- and 10-year averages of 19.8x and 18.3x, respectively. Looking under the hood, the top 10 stocks in the index have a combined price-to-earnings ratio of 26.7x. The current state of public equity markets highlights the need for diversification in other, more favorably valued markets.

Looking at the broad private equity asset class, valuations are certainly more favorable, trading in the 47th percentile versus the 96th percentile for the S&P 500, illustrated in Exhibit 5. Looking only at valuations, private equity appears to be the more attractive choice, particularly when considering the level of concentration in technology stocks in public markets today. However, just as investors want to diversify concentration risk in the public tech sector, private equity markets are also dealing with their own concentration struggles as it relates to the limited partner (LP) secondary market.

The secondary market facilitates the trading of stakes in private equity funds by LPs, or investors, in those funds. This market has witnessed a surge in demand, resulting in higher, and, in many cases, less favorable pricing, with all secondary-focused funds trading at 88% of net asset value as of the most recent data, illustrated in Exhibit 6.

Exhibit 5: Equity Valuation Percentiles

Source: Bow River Capital

This supply/demand imbalance in the secondary market is a direct result of the slow exit environment seen in recent years, which has forced LPs to source liquidity in other parts of the market, like secondaries, often at a discount. General partner (GP)-led secondary funds have also seen increased interest, illustrated by record fundraising for private equity behemoths Ardian and Lexington, who raised a combined $51 billion last year. This surge in fundraising has added to demand pressures in the secondary space, making the asset class less attractive than other parts of private equity.

On the macro front, elevated interest rates are not helping the current situation, but Trump’s potential deregulation policies could incentivize activity in the initial public offering (IPO) market, which may help accelerate exits and bring much-needed supply to the private equity market. Investors don’t want to wait indefinitely for interest rates to drop or for a more favorable regulatory environment, and while parts of both public and private equity markets are overvalued today, opportunities still exist.

When valuations are high and activity is concentrated in one sector of the market, selectivity and quality become even more important, as does managing concentration risks—regardless of whether an investor is looking at private or public markets.

Exhibit 6: LP Secondary Portfolio Pricing

Source: J.P. Morgan Guide to Alternatives

The Bottom Line: Whether investors are looking at public or private markets, valuations and concentrations remain a critical determinant in the investment decision-making process, with caution warranted in the overvalued parts of any market, like tech in public equity and secondaries in private equity markets today.

Asset Class Performance Quilt

Markets are ever-changing, making diversification across asset classes and sectors a critical component of portfolio construction. As illustrated below, a Balanced 60/40 portfolio provides greater consistency of returns and less volatility over time.

Source: YCharts. Asset class performance is presented using market returns from an exchange-traded fund (ETF) proxy that best represents its respective broad asset class. Returns shown are net of fund fees for and do not necessarily represent performance of specific mutual funds and/or exchange-traded funds recommended by Centura Wealth Advisory. The performance of those funds may be substantially different than the performance of broad asset classes and to proxy ETFs represented here. U.S. Bonds (iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF); High Yield Bonds (iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corp Bond ETF); Intl Bonds (Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF); Large Growth (iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF); Large Value (iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF); Mid Growth (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF); Mid Value (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF); Small Growth (iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF); Small Value (iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF); Intl Equity (iShares MSCI ACWI ex US ETF); Emg Markets (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF); and Real Estate (iShares US Real Estate ETF). The return displayed as “60/40 Allocation” is a weighted average of the ETF proxies shown as represented by: 40% U.S. Bonds, 12% International Stock, and 48% Large Blend.

Global markets saw significant developments in the fourth quarter of 2024, concluding a year marked by economic shifts, policy changes, and geopolitical events. The S&P 500 achieved 57 new all-time highs, delivering a remarkable annual gain of 25% and marking its strongest back-to-back performance since 1997/1998. In the fourth quarter, the “Trump Trade” returned in full force following the November election results, significantly influencing market dynamics and delivering the strongest monthly performance of the year.

With Donald Trump securing another term as President, market participants quickly shifted their strategies to align with expected policy changes, including key proposed initiatives like deregulation, international trade, and lower taxes. As investors anticipated a favorable environment for corporate profits, U.S. equity markets, particularly those sectors with high exposure to domestic economic activity, benefited immensely. Focus on the “Trump Trade” also fostered renewed optimism in venture capital and the small-cap sector, which gained from speculation that domestic-focused companies would be prime beneficiaries under Trump’s administration. Below are highlights from the fourth quarter and year:

1. The S&P 500 and NASDAQ 100 both rallied +25% through year-end despite geopolitical headwinds, economic challenges, and the final five trading days of the year failing to materialize a Santa Claus Rally. Their strong performance was aided by the tech sector, which benefitted from the AI boom and contributed significantly to their growth. Magnificent Seven giants like Nvidia (NVDA), Meta (META), and Tesla (TSLA) propelled the indexes to new heights as these companies harnessed the transformative potential of AI and similar technologies, capturing investor interest and driving substantial returns.
2. The Magnificent Seven, comprising the seven largest technology stocks (Apple, Amazon, Alphabet, Microsoft, Meta Platforms, Nvidia, and Tesla), make up approximately 35% of the S&P 500 and nearly 50% of the NASDAQ. Investors fueled inflows into the stocks given their expanding service segments and innovative product lines, which resonated well with consumers worldwide. Given their size and profitability, investors believe that the Magnificent 7 companies’ scale and financial flexibility best position these companies to capitalize on artificial intelligence. While there has been some rotation out of the Magnificent Seven, given their exorbitant valuations, their complex interplay of innovation, market leadership, and strategic expansions contributed 55% of the S&P 500’s gains for 2024, with Nvidia alone producing 21% of the index’s return. Leveraging their financial flexibility and technological prowess, these companies positioned themselves at the forefront of market trends, setting the tone for technology-driven growth as we transition into 2025.
3. Cryptocurrency, once considered a high-risk investment, is gaining greater acceptance among retail and, importantly, institutional investors. Bitcoin (BTC-USD) surged to an all-time high of $108,369 in December, pushing the global crypto market’s value over $3T for the first time in three years, as BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, stated that a Bitcoin allocation of up to 2% in portfolios is “reasonable.” The shifting regulatory environment with Trump’s victory further aided the advance of cryptocurrency. While Bitcoin contracted from its peak to close the year, as digital assets grow and regulatory acceptance increases, many investors may seek an opportunity to capitalize.
4. Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index experienced a rollercoaster year, though it turned into a positive year for the second in a row. Driven by growth prospects, inflation, and monetary policy projections, the 10-Year Treasury entered 2024 at 3.88%, only to rise and peak at 4.70% before collapsing to 3.63%. As growth improved and the “Trump Trade” took hold, rates reversed sharply to end the year at 5.58%. Despite the yield rising 0.77% in 2024; the bond index eked out a positive 1.25% return.
5. Geopolitical Tensions and Volatility further supported the case for U.S. equities and pushed valuations higher. Tensions in the Middle East and Russia-Ukraine continued to escalate, as did tensions between China and Taiwan. Additionally, South Korea finds itself in the middle of a political crisis after their now impeached president briefly declared martial law, and both France and Germany saw their governments collapse in December, fueling geopolitical concerns.
6. Gold Bullion returned the best year since 2010 with gains of +27%. Strong global central bank purchases, rising geopolitical uncertainties, and monetary policy easing all propelled the safe-haven asset’s record-breaking rally near an all-time high of $2,790.15 on Halloween. While the surging U.S. Dollar took some of the air out of gold’s sail, the same catalysts that pushed gold higher in 2024 remain, potentially supporting further gains in 2025.
7. U.S. Dollar strengthens nearly 8%, the most since 2015 as solid U.S. economic growth, sticky inflation, and Donald Trump’s potential fiscal policy initiatives signal rates will likely remain elevated.

Market Recap 

Equities – U.S. stocks continued their impressive run through Q4, building on gains from earlier in the year. The technology sector remained a key driver of market performance, buoyed by an ongoing enthusiasm for artificial intelligence and other emerging technologies. Nvidia (NVDA) continued its meteoric rise, solidifying its position as one of the world’s most valuable companies. The S&P 500 rose 2.41% for the quarter, bringing its year-to-date return to an impressive 25%.
      
Bonds – The bond market experienced significant volatility in Q4, largely driven by shifting expectations for the economy, hypothetical fiscal policy, Fed policy, and inflation. Entering the quarter at 3.81%, the 10-Year Treasury yield rose sharply over the course of 2024’s final months to end the year at 4.58%. Robust economic growth paired with a slower pace of Fed rate cuts and the prospects of pro-inflation fiscal policy initiatives caused the market to reassess both long-term growth and inflation expectations higher, lifting long-term bond yields. With the upward move in yields, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index fell 3.06% in Q4, erasing earlier gains, though it still produced a positive calendar year, closing 2024 up 1.25%.

 Source: YCharts. The Bloomberg US Aggregate Index was used as a proxy for Bonds; the Bloomberg US High Yield 2% Issuer Capped Index was used as a proxy for High Yield Bonds; the Russell 2000 Index was used as a proxy for Small Cap Equities; and the MSCI ACWI Ex USA Index was used as a proxy for Foreign Equities.  All returns are based on total return levels as of 12/31/2024.

Economy: Robust Consumer Spending in 2024 

Consumption has remained one of the biggest drivers for the U.S. economy, whose real GDP is on track to expand more than 3% in Q4 2024. The consumer discretionary sector was the top-performing sector in December and one of the top sectors in 2024. Major retailers and discretionary companies capitalized on this year’s seasonal surge in holiday sales, which saw record-breaking transactions amid consumers’ willingness to stretch budgets for year-end gifting.

Despite the optimistic consumption data, businesses remain cautious and keenly aware of the potential risks posed by fluctuating consumer sentiment and the specter of inflationary pressures lingering from policy shifts both domestically and globally.

During Q4 2024, consumer spending remained a pivotal component of the economic landscape, although it exhibited signs of moderation. Robust consumer activity, invigorated by wage growth and stronger purchasing power than previous years, continued to support the broader economy. Despite elevated borrowing costs, consumers showcased resilience, navigating a complex environment marked by geopolitical tensions and evolving fiscal policies. The U.S. economy continued to demonstrate resilience in Q4. According to the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow model, as of Christmas Eve, Q4 growth is estimated at 3.1%, reflecting a continuation of the robust 3.1% expansion seen in Q3. This growth aligns with the Federal Reserve’s efforts to reach a “soft landing” and avoid recession while combating inflation.

Consumer spending is a bellwether for economic growth, but it also faces notable headwinds, most notably the rising levels of household debt. U.S. credit card defaults jumped to the highest level since 2010 as credit card lenders wrote off $46 billion in seriously delinquent loans through September (50% year-over-year increase); a sign that the financial well-being of lower-income consumers is waning after years of high inflation. Trump’s planned fiscal policy changes also have the potential to further erode consumers’ purchasing power, particularly if his policies lead to a resurgence in inflation.

Labor Market Dynamics

As one of the dual mandates of the Fed, the labor market remains a focal point of economic analysis. Marred by two hurricanes and a Boeing strike, October’s labor gains were anemic. Meanwhile, 227,000 jobs were added in November, beating expectations, as the unemployment rate inched up to 4.2%, which represents a 0.5% increase in unemployment from 3.7% to start the year.

Higher unemployment figures and reduced job openings tested the labor market’s resilience, with October job openings (JOLTs) around eight million, a palpable decline from nearly nine million openings in January 2024. Another signal of labor market softening is the ratio of job openings to those unemployed, which moved down over the year to 1.08:1. While the ratio of 1.08:1 is near historical levels, the ratio has fallen significantly from nearly two job openings for every job posting in 2022, indicating the labor market is showing signs of tightening.

As the number of open jobs trended lower, the number of unemployed job seekers trended higher, as evidenced by the more than one million additional unemployed persons from January through November. The current levels show signs of tightening, reflecting a labor market that remains healthy but is gradually moderating after an extended period of strength. More concerning is the reversal witnessed in wage growth. After bottoming in June at 3.83%, wage inflation has risen back above the critical 4% threshold. Robust wage gains have bolstered consumer spending but have also heightened the risk of reigniting inflation. Heading into 2025, the job market will serve as a key indicator of economic stability, with any significant downturn threatening consumer spending and overall economic growth, and also prompting potential shifts in monetary policy.

Inflation and Monetary Policy

Inflation trends remained a central focus for markets and policymakers. After showing signs of moderation in early 2024, inflation has remained sticky, with measures ticking up slightly in the latter part of Q4. The headline Consumer Price Index (CPI) edged higher to 2.7% year-over-year in November, while core CPI (excluding food and energy) held steady at 3.2%. In line with CPI, the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge ran into the proverbial wall mid-year and has proven stubborn during this last mile of contraction as the Core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index has risen from 2.6% in June to 2.8% in November. While significantly lower than the peaks seen in 2023, these figures remain above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target.

Following their surprisingly aggressive 50 basis point rate cut in September, the Federal Reserve reduced interest rates by another 50 basis points in the fourth quarter, bringing the interest rate cut total to 100 bps for 2024. December’s meeting also provided insight into the Fed’s outlook for 2025 and beyond. The Fed’s updated Statement of Economic Projections showed a slower pace of rate reductions in 2025 than previously projected in September, cutting projections in half from 100 basis points of cuts, to 50 basis points, or two potential 25 basis point cuts in 2025. This deviation sent long-term bond yields surging and prompted a risk-off mentality as investors started repricing a “higher-for-longer” outlook, causing a sell-off in interest rate-sensitive small-cap and technology stocks. With persistent inflation, wage growth elevated, and Trump set to take office, we anticipate the Fed to adopt a patient and methodical approach to future rate reductions.

Centura’s Outlook

We believe the Fed will ultimately deliver on their goal to lower inflation to its 2% mandate and avoid a recession for the U.S. economy. However, the Fed will need to monitor the state of the labor market deterioration and reversal of inflation closely if they are to fully avoid an economic contraction and achieve their inflation target. Successfully delivering lower inflation and monetary policy normalization should bode well for equities and bonds. As always, there are several potential risks looming, and investors should proceed carefully.

By most measures, the S&P 500 remains overvalued. According to FactSet, as of December 15, the forward 12-month Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E) was 22.3x, which is higher than both the 5-year and 10-year averages of 19.7x and 18.1x, respectively. Valuations continue to pose a risk to the market, as negative sentiment can lead to sharper sell-offs. Furthermore, the concentration of the Top 10 largest stocks in the S&P 500 poses a significant concentration risk. According to JPMorgan Asset Management, the 10 largest constituents represent 38.7% of the index as of December 31. Concentrations of this magnitude make the index more sensitive to changes in its top constituents, particularly when those 10 companies are significantly more overvalued than the remaining 490 companies, as is the case in the current environment. The P/E of the top 10 is currently 29.8x, while the remaining stocks currently boast a P/E of only 18.2x, both of which are above their historical averages. Concentrations like this are precisely why we favor global diversification across several asset classes, both public and private. This high level of concentration also supported our decision to reduce overall large-cap exposure, particularly to large-cap technology stocks, in our public model allocations as we enter the new year.

Looking under the hood of public markets, corporate profits remain resilient despite elevated borrowing costs. This trend is illustrated by the S&P 500’s fifth consecutive quarter of positive earnings growth, rising 5.9% in Q3 2024. As of December 20, FactSet estimates fourth-quarter earnings to expand at a faster pace of 11.9% year-over-year.

Since 2023, the Magnificent Seven has been responsible for most of the market’s earnings growth, increasing 31%, versus the -4% contraction of the remaining 493 companies’ earnings in the S&P 500 last year. This trend is expected to persist in 2024, but we remain optimistic as JPMorgan predicts the remaining companies outside the Magnificent Seven to catch up and accelerate earnings growth in the forward-looking environment. Both groups are expected to experience robust year-over-year earnings growth of 21% and 13%, respectively, in 2025. A broadening of earnings growth should bode well for increased market breadth and carve a path for higher broad-based returns for equities outside the Magnificent Seven.

Perhaps even more encouraging is the rebound and contribution to earnings growth expected from both mid- and small-cap companies. While elevated rates will continue to cause issues for some smaller companies, earnings for small caps are expected to grow 44% in 2025. When coupled with easing monetary policy, potentially pro-business fiscal policies like deregulation, international trade, and lower tax rates, the backdrop appears encouraging for mid- and small-cap companies; hence supporting our decision to eliminate our underweight and increase exposure in our allocations to align with our long-term target allocations.

From the political crisis in South Korea, to the government collapses in France and Germany, to the armed conflicts, notably in the Middle East, where tensions between Israel and Iran escalated, and in Russia-Ukraine, and the threat of intensifying conflicts between China and Taiwan – international markets are on fragile ground. As these international disputes unfold, they have a cascading effect on market sentiment, influencing everything from currency valuations to sector performance. The specter of further geopolitical instability remains a crucial factor to monitor in the upcoming year, with potential policy responses from global leaders poised to have far-reaching consequences for economic forecasts and asset allocations worldwide. One of the most significant economic initiatives anticipated in 2025 is the resurgence of tariffs under President Trump’s administration. Known for a protectionist stance, Trump’s economic strategy could reignite trade tensions globally as the administration revisits import tariffs with the goal of reshoring jobs and boosting domestic manufacturing. This strategy is expected to lead to a more protectionist trade policy, potentially affecting global trade dynamics and introducing volatility into markets sensitive to international trade. Given the disruption abroad, paired with a strengthening dollar, we further reduced our allocations to foreign equities.

Interest rate volatility was once again prevalent in 2024, and while we expect this trend to continue in 2025, we do anticipate more moderate moves. Markets repriced their growth and inflation expectations over the second half of the year, pushing long-term rates (as measured by the 10-Year Treasury) back over 4.5%. At this point, with so much unknown on the path of inflation and the fiscal policy front with Trump entering office, barring an exogenous event, we would expect long-term yields to remain range-bound, producing a return relatively in line with the coupons on bonds. We also expect to witness further bull steepening – where shorter-term yields fall quicker than longer-term yields, eventually normalizing the yield curve back to upward sloping, albeit given the latest Fed rate projections, at a slower pace than previously anticipated.

In conclusion, Q4 2024 capped off another year of significant market gains and economic resilience. The Federal Reserve’s pivot towards monetary easing provided a tailwind for both stocks and bonds, setting the stage for an interesting 2025. With so much uncertainty surrounding the changing political landscape and resulting policy changes, we enter the year with our allocations balanced and in line with our long-term targets. The reset to our allocations reflects our expectations for volatility in 2025 as markets work through the political noise and reassess potential economic ramifications, and, on the other hand, our expectation for solid earnings growth across U.S. equities. Diversification across several public and private market asset classes should serve clients well in 2025. As always, investors should remain vigilant to potential risks while positioning themselves to capitalize on opportunities in the evolving market landscape.

Thank you for your continued confidence and support. If you have questions or concerns, please contact your Centura Wealth advisor.   

The information provided is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. You should consult your attorney or tax advisor. 

The views expressed in this commentary are subject to change based on the market and other conditions. These documents may contain certain statements that may be deemed forward-looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected. Any projections, market outlooks, or estimates are based upon certain assumptions and should not be construed as indicative of actual events that will occur.   All information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed.  There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability, or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information and it should not be relied on as such. 

Centura Wealth Advisory is a registered investment advisor. Advisory services are only offered to clients or prospective clients where Centura Wealth Advisory and its representatives are properly licensed or exempt from licensure. 12255 El Camino Real, St. 125, San Diego, CA 92130.